|
|
Ferrari LaFerrari
|
|
|
|
Debut: 2014
Maker: Ferrari
Predecessor:
Enzo
|
|
|
|
Published
on 25
Sep
2014 |
All rights reserved.
|
|
Ferrari boss Luca di
Montezemolo has an acquired taste on names. Since he took over the helm
in the early 1990s, Ferrari started abandoning its traditional
alphanumerical nomenclature for special names associated with its
history. At first there was Maranello, then Scaglietti (its old
coachbuilder), Fiorano (its track), Scuderia (its F1 team), Italia (its
nationality) and California (its biggest market). When it came to the
company's top supercar, Montezemolo chose the greatest name of all,
Enzo. But what follows the Enzo could be a big headache because any
inferior names would not be acceptable. In the end, Montezemolo
said the new car is the ultimate expression of Ferrari, so he called it
LaFerrari. Yes, Ferrari LaFerrari.
That must be the silliest car name we have ever heard of!
LaFerrari is a long overdue
replacement for Enzo, which was introduced as
far back in 2002. Considering the time gaps between 288GTO and
F40, F40
and F50, F50 and Enzo was 3 years, 8 years and 7 years respectively, it
is abnormal for Ferrari to skip the top supercar league for so long.
One reason could be the domination of Bugatti Veyron. That car
overwhelmed the competition with excessive engineering – you want a
record-breaking top speed and acceleration? No problem,
the Bugatti gives you a quad-turbo W16 engine producing 1000 or 1200
hp, a heavy-duty twin-clutch transmission and a sophisticated
4-wheel-drive system to smash any existing records. Whether it is
overweight or it excels on tracks is not
important. For 8 dark years, the Bugatti led the supercar league to a
dead-end road. Without any technical breakthroughs, Ferrari knew it was
almost impossible to open a new chapter. It opted not to do another
Pagani or Koenigsegg either. Although there is always demand for
ultra-exclusive supercars, their market size and technical challenges
are not interesting to Ferrari at all. It was not until Ferrari heard
Porsche was developing 918 Spyder that it realized hybrid technology
was to be the next big thing – not
just to fuel-efficient cars but also supercars. Once it
had decided to go ahead, everything fell into place quickly. These
included the hybrid tech it learned in F1 racing and the associated
component suppliers. In the end, it trailed the 918 Spyder and McLaren
P1 by just a few months to the market.
|
The New Era of Hybrid
Supercars
2014 is going to be remembered by automotive historians as the start of
the hybrid supercar era, which is likely to be as important as the
carbon-fiber era in the mid-1980s. Although Porsche, McLaren and
Ferrari introduced their first hybrid supercars at the same time, their
technology and implementation are very different.
The Porsche is a real plug-in hybrid that you can charge it at home,
drive it in zero-emission mode for 30 km before firing the high-revving
petrol V8. To do this it gets a larger battery and more powerful
electric
motors, hence inevitably a weight penalty over its rivals. Its front
and rear motors enable intelligent 4-wheel-drive which is also absent
on its rivals. Besides, the 918 is a Spyder, and its interior is made
just as high-quality and usable as a Boxster. This gives it a more GT
character than either McLaren or Ferrari.
In contrast, the McLaren P1 is almost a race car for the road. Although
its hydraulically interconnected adjustable suspension can give it
surprisingly good ride comfort, it is most memorable in Race mode,
which
drops its ride height by 50 mm, stiffens spring rates by a massive 300
percent and
raise the rear wing by 300 mm. In this state it delivers the
strongest roadholding ever seen on a road car, LaFerrari included. The
twin-turbo V8 with the assistance of electric motor delivers crazy
mid-range punch, but its zero-emission mode is more like a joke. To
avoid numb brake feel it gives up regenerative braking at all, so it
may run out of battery after just a lap or two of maximum attack.
In many ways, LaFerrari seems more akin to McLaren. Its relatively
small battery and electric motor drive the rear wheels only and offer
no pure EV mode. It even doesn't bother to offer plug-in charging (I
like its honesty!) All Ferrari wants the electrification to do is to
enhance performance and fill the torque gap when the engine is running
at lower revs. However, the Ferrari differs from McLaren in many other
areas. Its large naturally aspirated V12 is superior in terms of
smoothness, linearity and sound quality. Its exterior, interior and
chassis are bespoke, unlike the P1 which is obviously derived from the
lesser MP4-12C. Moreover, its battery is recharged by the excess power
of engine as well as regenerative braking, so when it comes to
sustainable performance it has an upper hand.
|
However, the most important is it overwhelms its rivals in
specifications – it has the most power, the least weight and therefore
considerably higher power-to-weight ratio. To supercars perhaps nothing
is more important than this.
Comparison of Ferrari, McLaren and Porsche
|
Porsche 918 Spyder Weissach pack
|
McLaren P1
|
Ferrari LaFerrari
|
Engine
power
|
608 hp
|
737 hp
|
800 hp
|
Motor
power
|
286 hp
|
179 hp
|
163 hp
|
Combined
power
|
887 hp
|
916 hp
|
963 hp
|
Kerb
weight
|
1634
kg
|
1490
kg
|
1350
kg
|
Power
to weight
|
543
hp/ton
|
615
hp/ton
|
713
hp/ton
|
Top
speed
|
214
mph
|
217
mph
|
217
mph
|
0-60 mph
|
2.5
sec
|
2.7
sec
|
<
2.9 sec
|
0-124
mph
|
7.2
sec |
6.8
sec
|
<
7.0 sec
|
0-186
mph
|
19.9
sec |
16.5
sec
|
<
15.0 sec
|
Production
number
|
918
units
|
375
units
|
499
units
|
Price
before tax
|
€850,000
/ £710,000
|
€1M /
£866,000 |
€1.2M
/ £1M |
As a result, the Ferrari is also able to charge the highest price. Each
one costs £1 million or 1.2 million euros
before tax, which puts it at the same level of Bugatti and Koenigsegg
and slightly above Pagani Huayra (BTW, do you remember 288GTO sold for
"just" £73,000 back in 1984?). Even so, Ferrari
sold out all 499 cars slated to production in the next 2 years well
before its official
launch. At that time McLaren and Porsche were still struggling to sell
the remaining cars. Such is the attraction of Prancing Horse!
Chassis, Body,
Aerodynamics and Mechanical Layout
This car is the first road-going Ferrari in 4
decades designed without the involvement of Pininfarina. It was penned
by Ferrari's design director Flavio Manzoni, who took over from Donato
Coco (who unfortunately bet on Lotus) since 2010, having previously
designed some fabulous Lancias (including the Fulvia coupe concept that
won our Concept Car of the Year in 2004) and later on worked for
Volkswagen group. He also completed the F12 Berlinetta together with
Pininfarina. As the famed Italian design house has been underperforming
in recent years, it is not much of a surprise that Ferrari finally goes
its own way. The LaFerrari is not an easy design because its form has
to compromise with the need for strong downforce, enhanced cooling,
small glasshouse (to reduce frontal area and use of glass) and a long
wheelbase (2650 mm) required by the V12-electric hybrid powerplant.
This means it has no rights to match the beauty of, say, 458 Italia.
Still, the outcome is quite respectable. There are some
traces of Enzo to give a family resemblance, but the
overall shape is sleeker and more futuristic. The heavily sculpted side
intakes are quite extraordinary, concept-car-like. Ditto the blackened
glasshouse and the nearly separated front fenders. It looks striking on
the road.
The aerodynamics development is not focused on minimizing drag, as you
can see from its unremarkable top speed. Instead, the target is to
maintain good downforce. It employs a number of active aero aids, such
as the adjustable rear spoiler, moving flaps at the rear diffuser and
another pair of moving flaps at the front underbody. As they move,
downforce varies between 90 kg and 360 kg at 124 mph. The front and
rear downforces are also balanced.
Owing to the extra mass of hybrid power system, weight saving becomes
more critical to LaFerrari. It is built around a carbon-fiber
monocoque made of 4 different types of carbon-fiber materials. The
monocoque is 20 percent lighter than that of
Enzo yet its torsional rigidity is 27 percent up. It
provides direct mounting for the double-wishbones front suspensions. At
the back the powertrain and multi-link suspensions are mounted on an
aluminum subframe to absorb NVH. Magnetorheological adaptive dampers
are included in the package.
|
To save further weight, LaFerrari
adopted a measure not tried before on road cars. It ditches
conventional seats and fits seating pads directly onto the carbon-fiber
tub, very much like the practice of F1 cars (well, we saw that on
Lamborghini Sesto
Elemento concept before, but Ferrari puts it to production first). This
skips seat frames and adjustment mechanism. To fit
drivers of different sizes, the pedal box and steering wheel are
adjustable, and the seat pads are tailored to each customer. Another
benefit of this fixed seating arrangement is that the seating position
can be lowered. Now the driver sits 60 mm lower than the case of Enzo.
This
allows LaFerrari to adopt a 30 mm lower roof line (to benefit
aerodynamics and center of gravity) yet offers 30 mm extra headroom for
the driver to wear helmet.
Like its predecessor, LaFerrari employs butterfly doors, which open
both upward and outward together with parts of the roof and sills to
ease access.
The monocoque houses the lithium-ion battery pack, which is located on
floor level just behind the
cockpit. This helps the car to achieve a center of gravity some 35 mm
lower than that of Enzo. Although the hybrid system adds some 140 kg
– of which 60 kg comes from the battery – Ferrari still managed to keep
its dry weight identical to Enzo at 1255 kg. This means it is a
considerable 140 kg lighter than McLaren P1 and a massive 280 kg less
than 918 Spyder. It is even lighter than the simpler Pagani Huayra and
Koenigsegg Agera R! (Note: while
this sounds incredible, bear in mind that Ferrari has track records of
underrating kerb weights. Besides, there are talks that the owner's
manual stated another figure – 1490 kg for weight in running
conditions, which might translate to 1415 kg in DIN scale.)
Powertrain and
Performance
LaFerrari’s 6.3-liter direct-injected V12 is derived from the
production units of FF and F12. In the original FF, it developed 660
horsepower. F12 Berlinetta raised that figure to an incredible 740 hp
by using a super-high compression ratio of 13.5:1 and freer intake and
exhaust tuning. Considering its already high state of tune, you might
wonder how LaFerrari could improve it further to 800 horsepower at 9000
rpm. Surprisingly, it does not seek help from titanium connecting rods
like 458 Italia or 918 Spyder, because its shorter stroke (75.2 mm vs
81 mm in both cases) would not benefit as much. Its increased power
comes from mainly 2 modifications. The first is the addition of a
patented continuous variable length intake system. This is the first of
such systems since BMW’s DIVA. We don’t know the exact mechanism, but
you may google and find some patent drawings Ferrari filed a decade
ago. It shows some flexible tubes running within the intake plenum to
vary the length of intake air path in a continuous manner. All Ferrari
said is the system was used in F1 many years ago but was banned soon
afterwards. It goes without saying that the continuous variable length
intake system optimizes output across a wider rev band.
|
Another modification is the intake and exhaust. Because the engine is
now complemented with the low-end torque of electric motor, its intake
and exhaust can be tuned to favor high-end output. As a result, its
maximum rev is extended from the F12’s 8700 rpm to a record-breaking
9250 rpm, 100 rpm higher than the 4.6-liter V8 of 918 Spyder, and 250
rpm higher than Ferrari’s own V8 model. As Ferrari is turning to
turbocharging, I think this might be the peak of naturally aspiration
era.
The V12's maximum torque of 516 pound-foot is delivered at a rather
high 6750 rpm, but that doesn't matter, because the electric motor
supplies another 199 lbft from just above zero rpm. The motor also
produces up to 163 horsepower, bringing the total to 963 hp.
For simplicity, the 26 kg electric motor is mounted at the end of the
Getrag 7-speed dual-clutch transaxle. This inevitably deteriorates
front-to-rear weight distribution to 41:59, compared to 43:57 on 918
Spyder or 44:56 on both Koenigsegg Agera R and Pagani Huayra. The motor
drives the differential through a dedicated gear set rather than the
gearbox.
We have yet to see independent performance test data, but if Ferrari
delivers its promise of 0-300 km/h (186 mph) under 15 seconds, it will
be easily faster than 918 Spyder, decisively quicker than McLaren P1
and running neck to neck with Bugatti Veyron SS and Koenigsegg Agera R.
That said, straight line performance is not the focus of Ferrari. What
matters is track time. On Fiorano, LaFerrari laps in 1 min 20 sec, 3
seconds faster than F12 Berlinetta, 3.5 seconds quicker than 458
Speciale and 5 seconds clear of its direct predecessor Enzo!
|
On the Road
The first thing you notice is how different you sit in the LaFerrari
compared with any other supercars. You drop into the low, floor-mounted
seat which wraps you like a cocoon. Your legs are angled to horizontal
position as if driving a Formula race car. The cockpit is snug, of
course, but it is not as uncomfortable as imagined. Outward visibility
is quite good up front, less so at rear quarters, but that is to be
expected on most supercars. Cabin surfaces are either exposed
carbon-fiber or Alcantara. As in all Ferraris nowadays, the
strange-looking square steering wheel is the home of Manettino switch,
engine start button and adaptive damper switch. The TFT digital
instrument offers 3 different styles of presentation. As a whole, this
cockpit places functions and weight saving above aesthetic. It is
probably too racy for my taste.
In terms of speed, LaFerrari is certainly racy. It feels easily faster
than 918 Spyder and probably a bit quicker than McLaren P1. The
high-revving V12 and electric motor combine to provide the widest power
band we have ever seen. It is so responsive low down, with good thrust
coming as soon as you press the throttle, yet the powertrain is so
eager to rev beyond 9000 rpm. The sheer thrust goes through the
lightning-quick gearbox and translates into insane acceleration, yet
the power delivery is linear, with no lag and surge such that you can
precisely control the amount of power with throttle. Its linearity
means it doesn’t feel as explosive as McLaren P1 in the mid-range, but
it extends the thrills to higher rev. This is also why it avoids the
scary moments that trouble the McLaren at times and results in a better
driver’s car. Moreover, the sound the Ferrari naturally aspirated V12
produces is intoxicating, putting the McLaren twin-turbo V8 as well as
most rivals in shame.
On track, the LaFerrari is amazingly quick. Its roadholding and braking
are remarkable even by the high standards of its class. Its electric
power steering is surprisingly light yet ultra-quick, precise and
feelsome – much like a 458 rack boosted with more feel. Perhaps because
of the low center of gravity, the outstanding front-end grip, the
perfectly tuned traction and stability control, or the combination of
them all, the car slices through corners beautifully, displaying a
balance not found on most supercars. You can adjust its attitude with
throttle and counter locks as in a much smaller, less powerful sports
car. Its linear controls give you the confidence to exploit its
chassis. The well-modulated brake pedal is especially worth praising
for something working in tandem with regenerative braking (take note,
Porsche). As a result, the LaFerrari is incredibly fun to drive. In
fact, it feels like a 458 Speciale with 20 percent more cornering power
and 50 percent more straight line thrust.
|
On country roads, its versatility is even more obvious. Thanks to the
low center of gravity, its suspension is able to employ softer springs.
In addition to the magnetorheological adaptive dampers, the LaFerrari
rides with even more suppleness than 458 Italia. Its light and quick
steering continues to shine on bumpy roads as it has kickbacks all but
eliminated. The seamless gearshift and linear power delivery suit road
use. It doesn't pretend to be a GT, but its easy-going manner should
give you a wider scope to exploit its speed in the real world.
However, the most impressive of all is how “normal” it drives, or how
“un-hybrid” it feels. With the electric motor assigned to support the
V12 engine all the time, this car successfully avoided an unnatural
driving experience. Neither has it complicate the driving experience
with different propulsion modes (as in Porsche 918), power boost or
drag-reducing buttons (as in McLaren P1). You simply jump into the car
and drive it straight from garage. No need to read manual, no need to
experiment the effects of different modes. Its behavior is fully
transparent to you, whereas the clever electronics work silently behind
the scene. LaFerrari masters the art of “less is more”, because the
less complication it gives you, the more fun you can have.
Automotive historians will remember LaFerrari as the best of the hybrid
supercar trios breaking ground in 2014. It is also likely to be branded
as the best ever Ferrari supercar, or at least the best since F40,
depending on your viewpoints. They will praise its vision for switching
to hybrid power as well as its persistence of traditional driving
experience. I guess that is the last present Luca di Montezemolo brings
to the world as the Chairman of Ferrari. To me, its only problem is the
silly name. Why don't we give it a nickname instead? How about Ferrari Luca?
|
Verdict: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LaFerrari
|
2014
|
Mid-engined,
RWD |
Carbon-fiber monocoque, aluminum
subframes
|
Carbon-fiber
|
4702 / 1992 / 1116 mm |
2650 mm |
V12, 65-degree
+ electric motor
|
6262 cc |
DOHC 48 valves, DVVT
|
VIM |
DI |
Engine: 800 hp / 9000 rpm
Motor: 163 hp
Combined: 963 hp
|
Engine: 516 lbft / 6750 rpm
Motor: 199 lbft
Combined: >664 lbft
|
7-speed twin-clutch
|
F: double-wishbones
R: multi-link
|
Adaptive damping
|
F: 265/30ZR19
R: 345/30ZR20 |
1350 kg (dry: 1255 kg)
|
217 mph+ (c) |
<2.9 (c) / 2.5* / 2.4** / 2.4***
|
4.8* / 4.7** / 4.8***
|
<7.0
(c) / 6.9****
|
9.8* /
9.8** / 10.0***
|
<15.0
(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
tested by: *C&D, **R&T, ***MT, ****Quattroruote
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright©
1997-2014
by Mark Wan @ AutoZine
|
|