|
|
Published
on 4
Jan 2013
|
All rights reserved.
|
|
Back in 1998 Lincoln
was still the best selling luxury car brand in the USA. Since then its
fortune has been sliding like a roller coaster. Following the
retirement of old-school Town Car and Continental, and the failed
attempts to revitalize the brand with LS and MKS, the once prestigious
brand has been largely forgotten by the American public. Last year, its
ranking dropped to 8th with only 82,150 cars and SUVs sold, trailing
Mercedes, BMW, Lexus, Acura, Cadillac, Audi and Infiniti. In global
scale, it barely sold more vehicles (if not cars) than Jaguar. Until
now, Lincoln is still the biggest headache of Ford CEO Alan Mulally.
One problem troubling the brand for long is the lack of a clear
identity. Most Lincoln products are lightly modified versions of Fords.
They simply lack the style, build quality and mechanicals to compete
with the global luxury brands. To address this problem will take a lot
of time and money. However, if it succeed, the return will be enormous.
The first step Mulally has taken is to establish a new design center in
Dearborn (near Ford HQ) dedicated to Lincoln. It is the first
standalone Lincoln design department since the 1970s. Over time, the
center will expand to 180-strong, including stylists, engineers,
technicians and modellers. Its first product is the new generation MKZ.
The new MKZ is no longer a rebadged Ford Fusion. While it continues to
share platform with the latter, it gets a completely different body
shell that speaks of style more than ever. Frankly, its proportion is
as ill as a typical American family man – being too fat in the center.
A tall and arcing waistline means not even the oversized 19-inch wheels
can hide its bulk. But at least its waterdrop shape washes away the
conservative impression associated with Lincoln. Moreover, elegant
design details like the "split-wings" front grille and headlights
assembly, full-width LED taillights and a stepped waistline deliver a
classier image than previous attempts. This overweight family man is
quite smartly dressed.
Inside, the cabin is distinguished from Ford by employing a tall
transmission tunnel that flows smoothly to the center console. It
doubles as a good armrest as the gearshift lever has been replaced with
a push button and steering-wheel-mounted paddles. Unfortunately, that's
where its good points end. You will notice much the same instrument
readings, cheap turn-signal stalk and some switchgears as the Fusion.
Materials are not much better. The alloy accents are obviously
plastics. While most plastics are good quality for a mid-size family
car, they are not good enough to be used on a premium car whose price
can go up to US$50,000. Ditto the touch-screen infotainment system,
which is just a revamp of MyFord Touch. However, most disappointing of
all is the amount of space on offer: blame to the arcing roofline, the
Lincoln offers the least rear headroom in the class (front headroom is
not much better). Those over 6 feets will find headroom extremely tight
and legroom barely adequate. The shallow side glass also leads to a
claustrophobic feel to the rear passengers. Compare with Ford Fusion,
the Lincoln sibling offers less cabin space as well as luggage space,
something you won't expect for the premium you paid. For a car
measuring 5 meters long and carrying 1800 kilograms of mass, its space
efficiency is appalling.
The immense weight also hampers its performance. The same
240-horsepower 2.0-liter Ecoboost engine that serves as range-topper on
Ford is offered as entry-level engine here. It satisfies as long as you
don’t expect the same brisk acceleration as BMW 528i. Sitting above it
is a 300-horsepower 3.7-liter DVVT naturally-aspirated V6 that is
carried over from the larger MKS. By the standard of V6 it is not
particularly sweet revving or sounding. Power delivery is linear rather
than strong. Mating to an ordinary 6-speed automatic it does the job
decently without putting a smile on your face. There will be a hybrid
model using the same powertrain as Fusion Hybrid. Expect its
performance will be even more marginal.
We admire the ride and handling of Fusion. The MKZ is built on the same
suspension and chassis hardware but enhanced with electronic adaptive
damping and a control system ("Lincoln Driver Control") that alters the
setting for steering, throttle, gearshift and damping altogether.
Moreover, most buyers are expected to get AWD system to reverse its
cheap family-car-based image. Does it deliver on the road? Mostly. The
steering retains the response and precision of the Fusion. The
firm-biased suspension handles its mass competently in corners. The
braking is strong and reassuring. Ride quality doesn't match most other
luxury cars though. The lack of expensive aluminum suspension
components and a higher-than-usual center of gravity mean it needs a
stiffer setup to deliver the same body control. As a result, in
Normal and Sport mode the ride is quite harsh on uneven surfaces.
Comfort mode is acceptably absorbent but sacrifices handling.
Meanwhile, the part-time AWD system, which sends power to the rear
wheels only when the fronts slip, never skips the impression of a
front-wheel driver. Admittedly, most Lincoln drivers are unlikely to
push their cars hard enough to reveal this shortcoming.
So the new Lincoln is a bold departure from the old path, but it is
also flawed. It doesn't look handsome and expensive enough. It
accommodates too little and rides too hard to be called a luxury car,
especially one carrying an American badge. Its performance and handling
are both marginal in the class full of driver-oriented machines. For
what it offers, the asking price of $40-50K looks nonsense. You can buy
the much better BMW 5-Series and Audi A6 with comparable money
(although they are not so well equipped), knowing that they are made in
Germany with the best dedicated components. In contrast, the Lincoln is
built in Mexico together with its much cheaper, handsomer and arguably
better driving Ford Fusion sibling. The turnaround plan of Lincoln
still has a long long road to go.
|
Verdict: |
Published
on 4
Nov 2016
|
All rights reserved.
|
|
MKZ facelift and V6 twin-turbo
|
|
Lincoln MKZ has received a
facelift earlier this year to enhance the sense of luxury and distance
itself further from sister car Ford Fusion. The facelift concentrates
at the nose, which gets a more conventional mesh grille and wider LED
headlights. It is a positive change, but the whole car still cries for
a classier proportion than the cab-forward, banana-shape profile.
However, the most important change for this model year is the addition
of a flagship performance model, 3.0T AWD. Replacing the outgoing
3.7-liter naturally aspirated V6, the new 3.0-liter direct-injection
twin-turbo V6 is derived from the 2.7-liter unit serving Fusion V6
Sport. It shares the compacted graphite iron block (although C&D
incorrectly claimed aluminum) but has both bore and stroke increased to
realize the new capacity of 2959 c.c. Horsepower jumps to a neat 400,
while peak torque is equally neat at 400 lbft. This makes the MKZ more
powerful than anything in the class, including Mercedes C43, BMW 340i
and Audi S4.
Predictably, such a high output needs AWD system to cope with. The car
gets a GKN Twinster setup in similar concept (but different spec) to
Ford Focus RS. 2 hydraulic multi-plate clutch packs transfer power to
either rear wheels, not only enhancing traction but also allowing
torque vectoring. Nevertheless, its setup is not as aggressive as the
hot hatch. Normally the car drives the front wheels only, and there is
no drift mode, of course. You can have the 3.0T engine equipped on
front-wheel-drive MKZ, too, but its output is deliberately limited to
350 hp to tame torque steer. Strangely, the 400 lbft peak torque is
unaltered.
Despite the headline power and torque figures, the 3.0T AWD doesn’t
feel as quick on the road. C&D’s 0-60 mph time of 4.8 seconds was
achieved on a test car with Michelin Pilot Super Sport tires, which are
actually not offered to production cars (sometimes manufacturers play
tricks to get headline test figures). Other motoring journalists tested
the car and reported that it didn’t seem as powerful as 400 hp. One
reason is the car’s immense kerb weight of 1900 kg. Another is the slow
reaction of the outdated 6-speed automatic, which should not have been
used on a premium car.
Make no mistake, the 3.0T AWD is not a sports sedan. While it is fast
enough on straight, its limitations are exposed in corners. The
soft-setting suspension reveals too much roll in fast corners. The
nose-heavy chassis understeers when pushed regardless of torque
vectoring – can’t imagine it shares AWD hardware with Focus RS! The
steering is troubled with torque steer at times, and its feedback is
quite muted. There is not much fun to drive the car hard. Instead of
driving excitement, its best asset is cruising refinement. On highway,
it is smooth, quiet and relaxing to drive.
Unfortunately, the cabin is not luxurious enough to support the role of
luxury cruiser. The interior design remains more Ford than luxury. The
surfaces are mostly soft-touch or metallic-effect plastics, lacking
leather or other expensive materials. More unfortunate still, Lincoln
prices the car way too high. A fully loaded MKZ 3.0T AWD costs 66K USD,
more than even a BMW 535i. Lincoln clearly overestimated its brand
image and the competence of its salespersons.
|
Verdict: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MKZ 2.0 Ecoboost AWD
|
2012
(2016)
|
Front-engined,
4WD |
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel |
4930 / 1865 / 1478 mm |
2850 mm |
Inline-4
|
1999 cc |
DOHC 16 valves, DVVT
|
Turbo |
DI |
240 hp (245 hp)
|
270 lbft (275 lbft)
|
6-speed automatic |
F: strut
R: multi-link
|
Adaptive damping |
245/45VR18
|
1774 kg
|
- |
7.4*
|
21.6* |
|
MKZ
3.7 V6 AWD
|
2012
|
Front-engined,
4WD |
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel |
4930 / 1865 / 1478 mm |
2850 mm |
V6, 60-degree
|
3726 cc |
DOHC 24 valves, DVVT
|
- |
- |
300 hp
|
277 lbft
|
6-speed automatic |
F: strut
R: multi-link
|
Adaptive damping
|
245/45VR18
|
1815 kg
|
-
|
6.3*
|
16.5* |
|
MKZ Hybrid
|
2013
|
Front-engined,
FWD |
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel |
4930 / 1865 / 1478 mm |
2850 mm |
Inline-4, Atkinson cycle + electric
motor
|
1999 cc |
DOHC 16 valves, VVT
|
- |
- |
141 hp + 118 hp = 188 hp |
129 lbft + 117 lbft
|
CVT |
F: strut
R: multi-link
|
Adaptive damping |
245/45VR18
|
1743 kg
|
-
|
9.4*
|
25.3*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
tested by: *C&D, **MT
|
|
|
|
|
|
MKZ 3.0T AWD
|
2016
|
Front-engined,
4WD |
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel |
4925 / 1865 / 1475 mm |
2850 mm |
V6, 60-degree
|
2956 cc |
DOHC 24 valves, DVVT
|
Twin-turbo |
DI |
400 hp / 5500 rpm
|
400 lbft / 2750 rpm
|
6-speed automatic |
F: strut
R: multi-link
|
Adaptive damping
|
245/40ZR19
|
1900 kg
|
155 mph (limited)
|
4.8*
|
12.0* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
tested by: *C&D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright©
1997-2016
by Mark Wan @ AutoZine
|
|