Here
in Hong Kong, Galant is one of the top sellers of the segment. Not so
in
America or Europe, where Galant is a rather rare sight. Commercially
speaking
it is not very successful, but I do think car industry needs more such
cars instead of our average Camry. Why? because Mitsubishi Galant has
its
own character. Looking from outside you'll know it's designed by
somebody
with enthusiastic mind. Aggressive, sharp, with a lots of distinctive
features.
Isn't that 2 outside-faced headlamps and front bumper inspired Honda
S2000
? Putting this Galant into the same showroom as the organic Carisma
must
presents the greatest contrast. More clearly speaking, men versus women.
While the exterior design catches my heart, the interior receives no less praise. Although it doesn't have Volkswagen's build quality, it rivals well with the best of others in terms of fit and finish. Remember, it is built in Japan instead of Holland. The styling of dashboard is also far more handsome than most Japanese sedans, matching the aggressive exterior very well. There is sufficient of space - roughly equals to Camry and 406 but marginally eclipsed by Passat and American Accord. Seats, driving position and ergonomics of controls are all in Japanese standard, so is reliability. What makes the Galant unique is not only the styling, it also includes the engines. Don't be surprised, Mitsubishi offers no less than 7 petrol engines for the Galant, and some of them features very interesting technology. For Japan:
Again, the best thing is reserved for Asian. What the European gets is the 4-speed version, which is probably unsold stock. Yet it is already superior to the American Galant's 4A without Sport Mode. 5-speed manual is offered for all models except American's V6. When comes to chassis, the Galant's win hand is finally down. Driving leisurely, its soft suspensions ride smoothly while the light steering aids driving ease. However, assessing a car's handling requires pushing it towards the limit, then you'll find the Galant rolls too much while steering feel is fading out. Soon the car is prone to understeer and runs wide. Compare with European benchmarks, namely 406, Passat, Mondeo and Primera, the Mitsubishi bias towards comfort instead of handling, yet it ultimately can't match the suppleness of 406 or the fluency of Passat, because its soft suspensions were somewhat set up to compensate the lack of chassis stiffness. Tha's why on the most demanding road, the European benchmarks feel not only more sure-footed but also more refined, with less suspension noise generated. There is a sportier version called GTZ on sale in the USA, which has marginally stiffer suspension, rear spoiler and funny white-face gauges. However, it doesn't improve handling by too much so that some American journalists still prefer Accord's handling. That�s
in the keen driver's point of view. For the majority of family men and
women, Galant is still competent enough. Considering the poor Camry can
satisfy the most American families, I can't see why the Galant cannot.
|
The above report was last updated on 1 Apr 2000. All Rights Reserved. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|