|
|
Published
on 9
Mar 2014
|
All rights reserved.
|
|
In the nearly 50
years history of supercars, there were a few milestones. Lamborghini
Miura was the one that started all and defined what supercars should
be: exotic design, incredibly low body, mid-mounted and extremely
powerful engine. The first generation supercars including Countach and
Ferrari Berlinetta Boxer were actually very difficult to drive and to
live with. Porsche 959 changed this impression with computer-controlled
4-wheel-drive, adjustable suspension, a roomy cabin and manageable
controls. Meanwhile, Ferrari F40 brought race-car-sharp handling and a
true 200 mph top speed for the first time.
McLaren F1 was another milestone that everybody should remember. Not
only its jaw-dropping 240 mph top speed or incredible acceleration
figures, it was renowned for lightweight, central driving position,
active aero and a marvelous naturally aspirated V12. Although the F1's
speed records would be unparalleled in the next 12 years, its handling
could not match the 4WD Bugatti EB110, another milestone in my opinion.
However, it was another Bugatti that rewrote history again. EB16.4
Veyron was not just about spectacular performance and mechanical
specifications (something like a 16-cylinder engine in W formation, 4
turbos, twin-clutch gearbox and 4WD), it was its easy handling and
controls that made it special among supercars.
But the domination of Veyron lasted only 8 years. By 2013, the supercar
world became tired of Bugatti's supersize approach and called for smart
performance. Like what Formula One racing has been pursuing, KERS
(kinetic energy recovery system) or hybrid technology takes the
limelight. 3 such supercars were announced in the same year: Porsche
918 Spyder, McLaren P1 and Ferrari LaFerrari. Conceived the earliest,
Porsche 918 Spyder reached production just ahead of its rivals and
became the first ever hybrid supercar. In other words, a new milestone
is laid.
Styling and
Aerodynamics
Unexpectedly, the first hybrid supercar looks a bit retro. Its
proportion looks close to those of Porsche 907, 908 or 917, the 1960s
and 70s endurance race cars, as this is evident in the especially curvy
fenders, wraparound windscreen and large headlamps. Like its
predecessor Carrera GT, a targa roof is chosen to enhance its showroom
appeal. The windscreen might be a bit more upright than desired, but
this conforms to the tradition of Weissach – styling should not
compromise functions.
Behind the cockpit is a pair of rollover hoops fully integrated with
the carbon-fiber body shell. Further down there is a pair of top
mounted exhaust. Yes, this car has its exhaust gas emitted right above
the engine compartment like factory chimneys. This enables the shortest
possible
path and reduces back pressure. Moreover, it moves the hot exhaust
system further away from the floor-mounted battery pack, allowing the
latter to work at its optimum operating temperature of 20-40 deg C.
Design of the back end is more interesting than the front. Underneath
the 3-stage adjustable rear wing there is a pair of stylish taillights,
large hot air vents and a diffuser. As you would expect, the 918 Spyder
features active aero, including the aforementioned rear wing, a pair of
movable aero flaps at the front underbody and active front intake
shutters. Nevertheless, its aerodynamics performance is probably not as
good as McLaren or Ferrari. Drag coefficient is 0.36 for the
standard car or 0.35 with Weissach package option (which adds aero
blades at the rear end and aero flaps in the front air outlets), while
down force numbers are not even revealed.
Chassis, suspension,
steering and electrical propulsion system
Under the carbon-fiber body shell is a chassis that looks remarkably
close to that of Carrera GT. It employs not only a carbon-fiber tub
with integral windscreen and rollover hoops but also a carbon-fiber
rear subframe on which the engine and rear suspensions are mounted. The
latter contrasts to the aluminum ones on McLaren and Ferrari as well as
the chromed moly tubular frames of Pagani and Koenigsegg. The whole
carbon-fiber monocoque is produced by Austrian company CarboTech, which
also
supplies the Monocell of McLaren.
Whether the full carbon-fiber construction delivers significant weight
advantage I would not say. In fact, the 918 Spyder is not exactly a
lightweight. In standard form it tips the DIN scale at a considerable
1675 kg. Even if you tick the lightweight Weissach package, which
includes central-locking magnesium wheels (which save 15 kg), titanium
brake components, ceramic wheel bearings, CFRP rear
anti-roll bar, plastic film body coating (instead of paint) and has the
air-con and audio system deleted, it still
weighs some 1634 kg. While that number might sound fabulous beside
Bugatti Veyron, it is 144 kg more than McLaren P1 and likely to be 270
kg more than LaFerrari (if Maranello delivers its promise).
Part of the reason is its heavier electrical propulsion system. The
Porsche is the only car in the trio to offer a truly usable electric
drive mode – it
can cover up to 30 km (18.6 miles), at a speed up to 93
mph (150 km/h) and accelerate from 0-60 mph in just under 6 seconds.
This
necessitates a larger, 6.8 kWh lithium-ion battery and a pair of
electric motors with a combined output of 286 horsepower and 431
pound-foot of torque. As a result, the E-power system weighs as much as
314 kg. Another reason is Porsche wants to offer electric 4WD to
improve its handling, therefore it decides to employ 2 electric motors
– a 129 hp front motor drives the front axle through a fixed gear
ratio, while a 156 hp rear motor sits between the engine
and gearbox and provides extra power to the rear axle. It goes without
saying the 2-motor layout is heavier than the single-motor design of
its rivals. To avoid over-rev, the front motor is disengaged above 146
mph, by that speed on highway I suppose you no longer need the extra
traction.
The large battery pack is placed on the floor just behind the seats and
protected by the carbon-fiber tub. This guarantees a low center of
gravity. Meanwhile, the front motor helps improving front-to-rear
weight distribution to 43:57, slightly better than Carrera
GT. The fuel tank sits right above the battery.
The double-wishbone front suspensions and multi-link rear suspensions
are attached to the monocoque through racing-style uniball joints. They
incorporate adaptive dampers which is part of PASM. Note that the
918 abandons the Carrera GT's pushrod-operated inboard
spring/damper units for a conventional outboard and vertical design
because the PASM dampers are taken from the production parts pool.
As expected, the steering rack employs electrical assistance by ZF.
Like 911 GT3 and Turbo, it also employs 4-wheel steering – actually the
system was first developed on the 918 prototype and then transferred to
the production cars. At low speed it steers the rear wheels in opposite
direction to quicken turn-in and reduce turning radius. At higher
speeds the rear wheels turn in the same direction to enhance stability.
Braking is provided by PCCB carbon-ceramic brakes. The front employs
410 mm discs and 6-piston calipers while the rear uses 390 mm discs and
4-pot calipers. Other goodies include an electronic-controlled rear LSD
and brake-based PTV torque vectoring.
Engine, Transmission
and Performance
Interestingly, the internal combustion engine is a Ferrari-style
naturally aspirated flat-crank V8. It displaces only 4.6 liters, merely
100 c.c. more than Ferrari 458 thus is unusually small for a top-tier
supercar. However, it is even higher revving and more powerful than the
458 engine. Thanks to lightweight flat-plane crankshaft, titanium
connecting rods and other technologies learnt from the RS Spyder racing
program, it is capable to rev to 9150 rpm and produce 608 horsepower at
8700 rpm. Maximum torque is 398 pound-foot at 6700 rpm. Yes, the torque
delivery is quite peaky, but the electric motors compensate the lack of
urge at low rev thus this is never a problem. In fact, from merely 800
to 5000 rpm it offers at least 590 lbft of torque for your disposal!
Total system output is 887 hp and 944 lbft, the former is slightly less
than McLaren P1 and LaFerrari but the latter trumps both easily.
To make possible the top exhaust, this V8 employs inverse breathing,
i.e. the exhaust is located inside the V and the intakes are on the
outside. Its thin-wall exhaust system is made of Inconel, a
nickel-based alloy that is both lightweight and heat resisting. The
induction manifolds and air box are made of carbon-fiber reinforced
plastic. As expected, dry-sump lubrication is chosen to mount the
engine as close to the ground as possible. In fact, the mounting is so
low that the 7-speed PDK gearbox has to be turned upside down to align
with the crankshaft.
As for performance, Porsche claims the 918 Spyder has a top speed of
214 mph. It lacks both the horsepower and low-drag aerodynamics to
challenge Bugatti or Koenigsegg in this respect. Acceleration is much
better. With the help of front and rear E-motors, it can have 0-60 mph
accomplished in only 2.5 seconds. Nevertheless, it still can't quite
match Bugatti Veyron SS in the process to reach 200 km/h (7.2 sec
versus 6.7 sec) and 300 km/h (19.9 sec versus 14.6 sec). Both McLaren
P1 and LaFerrari will have it beaten in these measurements, too.
However, as we all know, Porsche is never interested in breaking
straight-line speed records. Instead, it pursues to offer the highest
real-world performance, which is best measured by lap time in
Nurburgring Nordschleife. The 918 set a new lap record there at 6
minutes 57 seconds, being the first production car to break the 7
minutes barrier (note: we deliberately ignore the Radical SR8 for
obvious reasons).
Rumors said McLaren P1 could be even faster, but so far there is no
official confirmation, so the 918 remains to be the King of the Ring.
On the Road
Interestingly, the Porsche supercar starts with electric mode and slips
into the street with complete silence, very much like a Toyota Prius.
Press the throttle harder and the V8 fires into life. The transition is
smooth but you are instantly aware of the engine from its noise and
some vibrations. The V8 is very responsive to throttle, and this
sensation is further amplified by the instant torque of electric
motors. The engine itself delivers the power linearly. Rev beyond 4500
rpm and it starts getting serious. You can't help flicking the driving
mode from Hybrid to Sport and then Race, speeding up the throttle and
PDK gearshift in the process. From 7000 to 9150 rpm the engine screams
like a racing motor. Its sound is so much more beautiful than that of
McLaren P1, being creamier and more addictive. Thankfully, Porsche
opted not to use turbocharging.
Is it as quick as claimed? Yes, no doubt. The electric motors pull it
out of corner with such violence that not even Bugatti Veyron seemed to
match. In fact, the combination of electric power, e-4WD, 4WS and
torque-vectoring makes it feel like 200-300 kg lighter than it actually
is, because it accelerates so quickly, turns in so sharply and corners
so flatly and neutrally. Thanks to the Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
rubbers, you can push it incredibly hard into apex, get back on power
incredibly early and utilize the extra front-end traction to take it
out of corner. The calibration of all the hybrid system and electronic
driving aids is so well done. Even if you switch off the ESP, it won't
suffer from big slides like a Carrera GT, a testament of the excellent
inherent balance.
Unlike that on the regular 911, the electrical power steering on 918
gets overwhelming praises from motoring journalists. It is quick, well
weighted and, most important, feels connected to the road. In contrast,
the brake is not so good. Blame to the regenerative braking, the
initial travel feels soft and artificial. Press harder and the ceramic
brakes are engaged, then the brake feel returns to normal. Rivals
McLaren and Ferrari probably know this very well from their F1
experience thus they decided not to use regenerative braking. Perhaps
Porsche should not let efficiency to compromise the driving experience.
As it is, braking becomes the Achilles' Heel of the otherwise flawless
918.
Like Bugatti, the 918 is easy to live with. Its ride is surprisingly
supple for a supercar if you leave it in normal mode. The roof panel
can be detached and stored in the front boot. The cabin offers plenty
of room and good seats. Visibility to the front is excellent. Not so
good at the rear but acceptable for a supercar. The build quality
follows the usual standards of Porsche, which should put McLaren P1 in
shame. Its exterior body panels are tightly fitted with narrow assembly
gaps. The paint is perfectly done. The interior is not only very well
built but also very stylish. Highlight must be the floating center
console with integrated touchscreen. It is also well equipped, with
sat-nav, infotainment system, Bluetooth connection and a classy Hi-Fi
system – alright, not standard fitted to the Weissach pack but they are
no-cost options. Pagani still builds the classiest cabin, but the
Porsche has to be the most modern and usable.
As expected, the 918 Spyder is very expensive. The standard version
costs €780,000 (£650,000) while Weissach pack commands €850,000
(£710,000). Porsche wants to build a total of 918 units, an
ambitious number for this very exclusive class, even though Carrera GT
managed to find 1270 buyers. Considering the enormous development costs
of its sophisticated hybrid system, it might not turn a profit.
However, the technologies it pioneered will undoubtedly benefit future
generations of 911, just like what 959 did many years ago.
|
Verdict: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
918 Spyder with Weissach
pack
|
2013
|
Mid-engined,
e-4WD, 4WS
|
Carbon-fiber monocoque, carbon-fiber
subframe
|
Carbon-fiber |
4643 / 1940 / 1167 mm
|
2730 mm |
V8, 90-degree + 2 motors
|
4593 cc |
DOHC 32 valves, DVVT
|
-
|
DI |
Engine: 608 hp / 8700 rpm
Motor: 286 hp / 6500 rpm
Combined: 887 hp / 8500 rpm
|
Engine: 398 lbft / 6700 rpm
Motor: 431 lbft
Combined: 676-944 lbft
|
7-speed twin-clutch
|
F: double-wishbone
R: multi-link
|
Adaptive damping
|
F: 265/35ZR20
R: 325/30ZR21
|
1634 kg
|
214 mph (c)
|
2.5 (c) / 2.5* / 2.4** / 2.2*** /
2.6**** / 2.5^
|
5.1* / 5.1** / 4.9*** / 5.3**** /
5.1^
|
7.2 (c)
/ 7.4^
|
10.5***
|
19.9 (c)
/ 19.1^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
tested by: *R&T, **MT, ***C&D, ****Autocar, ^Sport Auto
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright©
1997-2014
by Mark Wan @ AutoZine
|
|