|
|
MG 6
Debut: 2009
Maker: SAIC
Predecessor: No
|
|
The 5-door hatchback destines to
Europe, at least according to its plan...
|
2005 was a sad year to
British motor industry. On the 8th of May, MG Rover, the last
British-owned mass production car maker, ran out of cash and stopped
rolling out cars from its Longbridge plant. After some negotiations,
administrator sold the MG marque and most production equipments to
Chinese car maker Nanjing Auto. This signaled the end of the genuine MG
cars and the start of Chinese-built MG cars.
Initially, Nanjing produced a clone of Rover 75 (MG ZT) called MG 7, as
well as a handful of updated MG TF. They failed to make any impact to
the market, of course. In 2007, Nanjing itself was acquired by the much
larger Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation (SAIC) under the
guidance of government. With the availability of new fund, the group
established an R&D center at the old Longbridge site, hiring
British engineers and designers to produce a couple of new cars based
on the platform of Rover 75. The first one was Roewe 550, launched in
2008. The second was MG6, debuted in the China market in December 2009.
It is also the car we going to talk about.
|
"Four-door coupe" profile has been
chosen to keep it at the forefront of fashion.
|
If you have not heard of Roewe 550, I
suggest you to read our Roewe 550 report
first, because this will give you some useful background information.
Basically, MG6 is a Roewe 550 with different packaging and suspension
tuning. While the Roewe is a conventional 3-box saloon targeting
primarily at the domestic market, MG6 is a 5-door hatchback destining
to both China and Europe, at least according to its plan. The company
knows European customers prefer hatchbacks to sedans, and a handling
and ride characteristic biasing towards the sporty side. These two
requirements dictate the design and tuning of the MG.
Having learned this, it is not difficult to understand MG6. While key
dimensions and positions of hard points are the same as its sister car,
its exterior design is much sportier. A fastback, "four-door coupe"
profile has been chosen to keep it at the forefront of fashion. Its
nose and headlights are quite stylish, certainly much more than the
tail. A rising waist line and sloping roof line lead to shallow side
glass, so the interior looks dark and confined, especially to the rear
passengers. The latter will also find headroom in short supply. People
over 5 ft 10 in will have their heads touching the roof lining,
although there is enough legroom for 6-footers.
|
Conventional dials can't save this
cabin... fake alloys look just fake.
|
To save money, the MG6 keeps the
dashboard of Roewe 550, whose ordinary design is out of sync with its
sporty exterior. Build quality is good by the standard of Chinese cars,
but not good enough to match European offerings. Plastics look
plasticky. Fake alloys look just fake. The "Le Mans" digital instrument
reading of Roewe has been replaced with conventional dials, though it
still fails to impress. The only upside is luggage space, measuring 430
liters normally or 1380 liters with rear seats folded. The hatchback
door makes loading luggage easier.
Like its sibling, MG6 offers two outdated engines – 1.8-liter VVT with
133hp and 1.8-liter turbo with 160hp. Both were developed from Rover
K-series. As in Roewe 550, the naturally aspirated engine is
underpowered, while the turbocharged unit has some turbo lag, lacking
shove below 2500 rpm. Most European turbo engines solved this problem
by integrating the turbocharger with exhaust manifolds, but the
Rover-based engine is just too old to adapt. Mating with a 5-speed
manual or a slow-reacting 5-speed Tiptronic automatic gearbox does not
help. As a result, its performance is far from satisfying.
|
The updated Rover platform seems
neither rigid nor well insulated enough to take on such a sporty
tuning...
|
To distinguish its driving manner from Roewe, MG6 employs
much stiffer springs and dampers in its MacPherson struts and Z-axle
suspensions, and a set of slightly lower profile tires. As a result, it
resists body roll strongly through corners. On fast roads, its handling
is more surefooted, and the damping overcomes speed bumps cleanly.
Steering is weighty and precise. Nevertheless, the tradeoff is a very
stiff ride on less than smooth surfaces. Low-speed bumps and broken
pavements are felt through the seats, dashboard vibration and noise.
The updated Rover 75 platform seems neither rigid nor well insulated
enough to take on such a sporty tuning. In fact, the tuning of its
Roewe sister is actually better judged.
Considering competition in Europe is so intense, I don't think MG6 can
make a business case there. European buyers will expect a better built
and more stylish cabin, better powertrain and better running
refinement. Moreover, the Chinese MG's heavy fuel consumption and
excessive carbon-dioxide emission will win few friends in Europe.
Lastly, SAIC needs to persuade people to believe this is a real MG
rather than a badge-engineered Chinese product, which is perhaps the
most difficult task. If it think assembling the car at Longbride from
knockdown kits would be the solution, then I can only say good luck to
it.
|
The
above report was last updated on 15 Mar
2010. All Rights Reserved. |
Specifications
|
|
|
Table 1
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
General remarks |
Layout |
Chassis |
Body |
Length / width / height |
Wheelbase |
Engine |
Capacity |
Valve gears |
Induction |
Other engine features |
Max power |
Max torque |
Transmission |
Suspension layout
|
Suspension features
|
Tires |
Kerb weight |
Top speed |
0-60 mph (sec) |
0-100 mph (sec) |
|
MG6 1.8T |
Front-engined, FWD
|
Steel monocoque
|
Mainly steel
|
4653 / 1827 / 1478 mm |
2705 mm |
Inline-4
|
1796 cc |
DOHC 16 valves
|
Turbo
|
- |
160 hp / 5500 rpm
|
158 lbft / 2500-4500 rpm
|
5-speed manual
|
F: strut
R: multi-link (Z-axle)
|
-
|
215/50WR17 |
1495 kg
|
130 mph (c)
|
8.5 (c) / 8.8*
|
25.8* |
|
|
|
|
Performance
tested by: *Autocar |
Copyright©
1997-2010
by Mark Wan @ AutoZine
|
|
|