|
|
Ssangyong Chairman W
Debut: 2008
Maker: Ssangyong
Predecessor: Chairman (1997) |
|
With Mercedes technology and V8
engine, can Ssangyong beat Hyundai Equus ?
|
If
you love watching Korean TV dramas and films, you may notice Ssangyong
Chairman usually served as the limousines for the riches. Occasionally
Hyundai Equus might be used instead, but my unofficial statistic shows
Chairman has the highest exposure rate in screen play. Unlike the rest
of the world, Korean customers are not fancy with imported luxury cars
like Mercedes, BMW or Lexus. Individual customers might, but since
corporate sales accounts for 70 percent of the Korean luxury car
market, and Korean companies are extremely patriotic, they never look
to foreign brands. Moreover, local limousines cost just a fraction of
their imported competitors, so they are the easy choices for corporate
customers. As a result, Ssangyong Chairman and Hyundai Equus can rely
purely on domestic sales for survival. Between them, the Ssangyong
usually came top on the sales chart.
Ssangyong is a very small company compared with Hyundai. It could play
the role David against Goliath not because of its own strength, but
with the invisible arm of Lord Mercedes. The old Chairman was derived
from last generation Mercedes mechanicals and developed with the help
of Mercedes engineers. Hyundai Equus also got foreign technology
transfer, but that came from Mitsubishi. It's no brainer who would beat
another.
|
Subjectively, this car doesn't feel
like in the same league as its German rivals...
|
13 years has
passed since the Chairman was born. Today, a new battle is going to
break out. On one side of the boxing stage is the new generation Equus,
this time a very decent work from in-house designers and engineers
based on Genesis platform. Another side is the new Chairman W, where W
stands for "world class". It is once again built upon Mercedes
technology, this time upgraded to the S-class W220 platform. The German
must have received a lot of money, otherwise it would not have
generously supplied a platform having retired from its own frontline
for just 4 years.
When we talk about W220 platform, we also mean its associated
technology, such as Airmatic suspension, adaptive damping, 4matic 4WD
system, radar cruise control... even the latest 7G-Tronic transmission
is included in the supply list ! No wonder Ssangyong claims the new
Chairman is a world-class luxury car, one that could compare with
Mercedes S-class, BMW 7-series and Audi A8.
Subjectively, however, this car doesn't feel like in the same league as
its German rivals. Its styling is conservative, outdated and lack of
originality – it looks as if a BMW smashed into a Mercedes-Benz from
the back, doesn't it ? The car actually looks more like a Chinese
product. Ssangyong was briefly owned by China's Shanghai Automotive
(SAIC) from 2004 to early 2009, but I think that is not the reason.
Development of Chairman W seemed to have started well before the
Chinese got effective control. In fact, SAIC was more interested in
Ssangyong's SUV know-how, therefore it was not involved in the luxury
car program. It should be Ssangyong's designers to take the
responsibility for its poor looks. They have been notorious for
odd-looking SUVs, so it's not surprise to see another bad design.
|
It looks as if a BMW smashed into a
Mercedes-Benz...
|
The cabin is
no better. No matter design, materials or build quality, it is not up
to world standards. Korean tycoons must have questionable taste,
otherwise the Chairman (as well as Equus) would not have employed a
dreadfully dark interior trim, fake-looking wood inserts and a
dashboard design without any style to speak of. There are many classy
equipments, but their execution and attention to details is poor. For
example, the rear LCD monitor has a cheap-looking pivot and plastic
housing. This might be the outcome of cost savings, but it gives
impression of a Chinese car again.
Nevertheless, the cabin does provide a lot of space. Bear in mind that
Chairman is slightly larger than the old S-class in all dimensions, no
matter length, width, height or wheelbase, so it can easily satisfy the
most demanding tycoons. For those demanding true limousine grace and
space, a long wheelbase version provides an additional 300 mm length to
the cabin. Besides, both versions provide a 624-liter trunk, easily
topping the class.
Apart
from space, Chairman also provides a lot of luxury features, such as
memory ventilated (heated and cooled) seats, slide and tilt rear seats,
power doors, power trunk lid, 8-inch touch screen, armrest-mounted
entertainment control system for both rows, Harman/Kardon 7.1 surround
sound system (same as Mercedes S-class), an i-Drive like control
system, drink cooler/warmer, speech command recognition… By the way,
the seat adjustment control seems taken straight from Mercedes. Safety
equipment includes the usual traction control, stability control, brake
force distribution, tire pressure monitor, radar cruise control and 10
air bags. However, the lack of night vision infrared camera, drowsy
detection and Pre-Safe system separates it from the current S-class.
After, the German has to reserve the most sophisticated technology for
themselves.
|
Chairman is slightly larger than the
old S-class in all dimensions...
|
For the same reason, Chairman W is powered by older generations of
Mercedes engines. Most of the sales are expected to go to the cheaper
3.2-liter (220hp) and 3.6-liter (250hp) straight-six engines. The
Mercedes 3.2-liter straight-six was transferred to Ssangyong many years
ago, initially powered its SUVs, then also the original Chairman. Later
on, it was derived into 3.6-liter version. I still have fond memory of
the Mercedes straight-six for its smoothness and eagerness, but
compared with its latest V6, it is neither as quiet nor as frugal.
Moreover, even in the largest form it is not torquey enough to pull the
2-ton Chairman with the enthusiasm we expected. This mean the 7-speed
automatic gearbox works busier than we would like.
Previously, Chairman was never offered with V8 engines. As the new
Hyundai Equus was set to get its in-house-developed Tau V8, Ssangyong
had to respond with the purchase of the late Mercedes M113 5.0-liter
V8. You might remember that engine had a special lightweight
architecture with SOHC per bank, 3 valves and two spark plugs per
cylinder. Its intake variable valve timing, variable intake manifolds
and fuel-saving cylinder cut-off technology still sounds modern today.
In the Chairman W, its power output is unchanged at 306 hp, though
maximum torque has been reduced slightly to 326 pound-foot. The extra
punch and smoothness should lift the image of Chairman W a lot.
However,
I won't say the
V8 is the pick of the range. Firstly, it costs as much as 50 percent
more than the 3.6-liter car, which is unreasonable. Secondly, it is
still not quick enough. It would be okay if it matched the old S-class'
6.2 seconds 0-60 mph acceleration, but hampered by an additional 160 kg
of weight, the Chairman takes 6.6 seconds. How can it fight against the
top Equus, which offers another 100hp from its 5.0-liter Tau V8 ? To do
that, Ssangyong would need the latest Mercedes M273 V8 rather than the
old M113.
|
Despite of its name, Chairman W is not
world-class yet...
|
Anyway,
Chairman W is never meant to be a performance limousine. Its suspension
is tuned to bias strongly towards ride comfort, sacrificing body
control and agility. Its steering does not talk to the driver. Its
tires lack grip. Its braking performance is below average. Driving
pleasure has never been considered in its making, because its drivers
are always chauffeurs. What it cares is the VIP at the back seat,
whether he is served with smooth ride and a quiet environment while he
is reading investment proposals or making international phone calls. To
the boss, Chairman is only a means of transportation or a mobile
private room. From this point of view, more performance is not
necessary.
Nevertheless, Mercedes and Lexus do the comfort job better. Yes, in
Korea they ask for twice the money of Ssangyong, but they provide
quality, technology and design unmatchable by the Korean car. Despite
of its new name, Chairman W is not world-class yet.
|
The
above report was last updated on 18 Feb 2010. All Rights Reserved. |
Specifications
|
General remarks |
Layout |
Chassis |
Body |
Length / width / height |
Wheelbase |
Engine |
Capacity |
Valve gears |
Induction |
Other engine features |
Max power
|
Max torque
|
Transmission |
Suspension layout
|
Suspension features |
Tires |
Kerb weight |
Top speed |
0-60 mph (sec) |
0-100 mph (sec) |
|
Chairman W 3.6 |
Front-engined, RWD
|
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel |
5110 / 1895 / 1495 mm |
2970 mm |
Inline-6
|
3598 cc |
DOHC 24 valves, VVT
|
- |
- |
250 hp
|
253 lbft
|
7-speed automatic |
All multi-link
|
Adaptive air springs + damping
|
235/55R17 |
1923 kg |
130 mph (c) |
9.0 (est)
|
- |
|
Chairman W 5.0 |
Front-engined, RWD
|
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel |
5110 / 1895 / 1495 mm |
2970 mm |
V8, 90-degree
|
4966 cc |
SOHC 24 valves, VVT
|
Variable intake
|
Twin-spark |
306 hp
|
326 lbft
|
7-speed automatic |
All multi-link
|
Adaptive air springs + damping |
245/45R19 |
1960 kg |
143 mph (est) |
6.6 (c)
|
- |
|
|
|
Performance
tested by: - |
Copyright©
1997-2010
by Mark Wan @ AutoZine
|
|
|