|
|
Published
on 25
Jan 2012
|
All rights reserved.
|
|
20
years ago Toyota
created Aristo / Lexus GS to challenge Mercedes E-class and BMW
5-Series in the executive cars segment. Like many Japanese cars
born in that era, it was an impressive first attempt, with good looks,
fine performance and advanced technology to make the German worrying.
However, contrary to our prediction, the GS line never quite matched
the success of its German rivals in the following years. Not only it
failed to challenge the established German machines, it slipped behind
the fast-rising Audi A6 and is now struggling to keep up with Jaguar XF
and Infiniti M. What's wrong with it?
Forgive me for reserving my opinion until the end of this article. Let
us see Toyota's viewpoint first: the outgoing GS was comfortable and
refined, but it lacks driver appeal to please the trend of this
segment, which is increasingly biased towards the sporty side.
Therefore, for the fourth generation GS, Toyota injected a lot more
spicy flavors. Here you can see a twist of the "L-finesse" styling
theme with Chris Bangle-style assaultive and unsettling approach. The
harmony of the old car has gone, replaced with some razor-sharp blades
and heavily twisted surfaces which challenge the limits of your taste.
More adventurous might be, it is not to be confused with beauty.
The philosophy of chassis tuning has also been shifted to the sporty
side. Drive the car, you will immediately realize the electrical power
steering has gained weight as well as response, if not exactly road
feel. The car is more eager to steer thus it feels lighter on its feet.
You can still get a smooth and quiet ride for regular day-to-day trip,
but in case you are in mood to have some excitement, now you have the
option to select Sport or Sport+ mode (beside Eco and Normal) like
those European rivals. In this way you will get sportier throttle,
steering, damping and stability control. Existing owners of the GS will
be surprised by its new found agility and sharpness, especially if the
car is optioned with 4-wheel steering. If not enough, there is the F
Sport package which brings even sportier suspension tuning, larger
brakes and unusually wide rubbers measuring 265/35R19. Admittedly,
those absurd rear tires rob it the ability to oversteer like a good BMW
5-Series. When it does oversteer, it comes abruptly thus is nowhere as
accessible as the BMW. This prevents it from challenging the latter as
a driver's car. However, we have to say few buyers might care about
this issue, as the majority are unlikely to play oversteer on public
roads.
As before, the GS sits on the same platform as its Japanese sister
Toyota Crown (as well as Mark X). Most of the sophisticated
technologies are shared, such as the AVS adaptive damping, TFT LCD
instrument reading, infrared Night Vision, Pre-Crash safety system,
driver drowsiness monitor and head-up display. They also share the
double-wishbones and multi-link suspensions, electrical power steering,
multi-plate clutch 4WD (beside the standard RWD version) and all
powertrains. Most of these are lightly adapted from the last
generation. For example, the front suspensions featured more aluminum
components to cut unsprung weight. The rear suspensions have their
springs and dampers separated to reduce intrusion to the boot.
The powertrain is relatively disappointing. Now the powerful 4.6-liter
V8 has been dropped because of poor sales and the rise of environmental
consciousness. Entering the scene is an entry level 2.5-liter
direct-injected V6 with 210 hp and 187 lbft. It is not gusty enough to
haul the 1.7-ton car, so our pick of the range is still the carried
over 3.5-liter DI V6 with 306hp and 277lbft. Although it is not as
flexible as the forced induction BMW 535i or Audi A6 3.0TFSI, its top
end power and its progressive manner are still appreciable. 0-60 mph
can be done in a respectable 5.7 seconds. Unfortunately, its partner
remains to be that outdated 6-speed automatic, which lacks the response
and precision of its 7 or 8-speed rivals. Just wonder why it does not
adopt the 8-speeder from LS460, because that would have given the old
motor a new lease of life.
Because of the demise of V8, now GS450h hybrid takes the role of the
flagship model. As before, it comprises of the 3.5-liter V6 and a pair
of permanent magnet electric motors (one for propulsion and another for
regeneration) and produces a combined 338hp. There is some refinement
to the system to make it more efficient. For example, the V6 now runs
in Atkinson cycle like other Toyota hybrid motors. The cooling to power
electronics has been improved. The battery pack is now vertically
positioned behind the cabin to increase luggage space. The regenerative
braking now operates across a wider range. All help the hybrid car to
boost its EPA mileage from 22 to 29 mpg in city and 25 to 34 mpg on
highway. Nevertheless, the GS450h is still hardly a recommendable
choice. Carrying 160kg more than GS350, its handling suffers a little
and its acceleration is no faster than the lesser model. The rubberband
effect of its CVT and the mushy brake pedal feel – typical to hybrid
cars – rob it some driving pleasure. Moreover, it is more expensive
than a BMW 535d, which offers better performance and handling yet
easily matches the Lexus for emission (142g/km vs 137g/km) and fuel
consumption (52.3 mpg vs 47.9 mpg in EU combined cycle). It's no
brainer to choose the BMW.
Admittedly, the Lexus is better equipped than its German rivals. Its
interior is very well made, with plenty of rich materials and classy
features, such as bamboo trim and a 12.3-inch sat-nav screen – said to
be the largest in production cars, at least until the arrival of Tesla
Model S with its 17-inch item. On the downside, the interior styling is
a bit boring and the space it offered is barely average. Unlike the
early Lexus, it has not set any new standards on cabin quietness and
refinement. Now its German rivals are on a par with it.
Despite of the enhanced driver appeal, the new GS is not going to be a
class leader. It lacks the all-round appeal of BMW 5-Series and
Mercedes E-class, the performance edge of Infiniti M56 and the romance
of Jaguar XF. That brings us back to the question: why does it fail to
raise its game? I suppose because Toyota Crown and Mark X stretch its
development budget thin. If Toyota could consolidate the three into
one, just like what Nissan did to Cedric, Gloria and Infiniti M, it
might be able to afford new engines, transmission and some new
technologies to better its oppositions. Of course, that decision would
not be easy. The Crown has strong customer base in Japan thus it is not
to be abandoned. Neither the Lexus can be abandoned, as Toyota has
invested enormous money to build the brand overseas. In my opinion, the
best solution is to kill the Mark X and combine Crown and GS into a
single model while keep using their existing names for different
markets. Only in this way there will be hope for beating the European.
|
Verdict:
|
Published on 17
Oct 2015
|
All rights reserved.
|
|
GS F
|
|
Long story short, Lexus GS
F is essentially a GS transplanted with the powertrain and chassis
upgrades of RC F. This means the engine
is a 5.0-liter naturally aspirated V8, a rarity in today's market. It
produces 467 hp (SAE) or 477 hp (DIN) at a rather high 7100 rpm,
enabling the performance sedan to quote 0-60 mph at 4.5 seconds and a
top speed of 168 mph. Toyota's in-house 8-speed automatic hooks up to
an active differential (also borrowed from RC F) and drives the rear
wheels. The suspensions are stiffened (as is the monocoque chassis)
but, strangely, they forgo the adaptive dampers of lesser GS models and
rely on passive Sachs dampers. Likewise, the active rear-wheel steering
hardware is ditched to make development simpler. Larger Brembo brakes
are used, while the
footgear gets the necessary upgrade. In short, all the modifications
are conventional and predictable.
As GS F is so conventional, it is neither as fast nor as versatile as
its rivals. All of its rivals now employ turbo or supercharged V8s with
the north of 550 hp and double the torque at mid-range rev. Some also
fitted with 4WD and good for 0-60 mph in 3.5 seconds. Although 4.5
seconds would have been seen as top of the class a decade ago, today it
is hopelessly slow. The lack of low-down torque amplifies this feeling
in the real world, as the Toyota V8 needs rev to wake up. Even at the
torque peak of 5000 rpm it does not feel as punchy as its rivals, just
as the 389 lbft of torque suggested. For comparison, a Mercedes E63 AMG
has 590 lbft from as low as 2000 rpm.
Because of the naturally aspirated V8, what Lexus can sell is the
classic feel. Yes, I admit it is enjoyable to stretch a V8 to 7300 rpm,
something all its contemporary rivals miss. The linear power delivery
and the resultant connection between man and machine is good. However,
if we love the old-fashioned fun, why not get a used E60 M5? The
5-liter V10 of that car revs even higher (some 1000 rpm higher than the
Lexus!) and delivers more horsepower, too. Moreover, its race-car-like
exhaust note is several leagues more exciting than the subdued sound of
Lexus V8. If Lexus was really keen to please hardcore drivers, I think
it should have put the LFA's V10 into this
car, because that could have created a really characterful machine.
As it is not, the GS F is set to be a compromise. Not just engine,
compromises can be found in other areas. Its
8-speed automatic gearbox is slow in manual mode and sometimes
inconsistent in auto mode, not worth a place in the sports sedan
market. The car's handling is okay, but the passive suspension rides
firmly and prefers flat roads. The steering is mostly acceptable, but
you won't remember it for communication, unlike the rack of Cadillac or
Jaguar. And that mouth! or the so-called "Spindle grille", which proves
that ugly is a way to show unique taste. You would buy this car only if
you dislike E63, M5, CTS-V, RS6 or just about anything else in the
class. Incredibly, Lexus believes every
year there will be 2000 such people in the
US market alone to buy this car. I can only say good luck.
|
Verdict: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GS350 F-Sport
|
2011
|
Front-engined,
RWD,
4WS |
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel
|
4845 / 1840 / 1455 mm |
2850 mm |
V6, 60-degree
|
3456 cc |
DOHC 24 valves, DVVT
|
- |
DI |
306 hp
|
277 lbft
|
6-speed automatic
|
F: double-wishbone
R: multi-link
|
Adaptive damping
|
F: 235/40R19
R: 265/35R19
|
1720 kg
|
155 mph (c)
|
5.7 (c) / 5.5* / 5.5**
|
13.6* / 13.2**
|
|
GS450h
|
2011
|
Front-engined,
RWD,
4WS
|
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel
|
4845 / 1840 / 1455 mm |
2850 mm |
V6, 60-degree, Atkinson cycle,
electric motors
|
3456 cc |
DOHC 24 valves, DVVT
|
- |
DI |
286 hp + 52 hp = 338 hp
|
engine: 254 lbft
|
CVT
|
F: double-wishbone
R: multi-link
|
Adaptive damping |
235/45R18
|
1880 kg
|
155 mph (c)
|
5.6 (c) / 5.7* / 6.0***
|
13.6* / 14.0***
|
|
GS F
|
2015
|
Front-engined,
RWD
|
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel
|
4915 / 1845 / 1440 mm |
2850 mm |
V8, 90-degree
|
4969 cc |
DOHC 32 valves, DVVT
|
VIM |
DI |
467 hp / 7100 rpm
|
389 lbft / 4800-5600 rpm
|
8-speed automatic
|
F: double-wishbone
R: multi-link
|
-
|
F: 255/35ZR19
R: 275/35ZR19
|
1830 kg
|
168 mph (c)
|
4.5 (c) / 4.4* / 4.4*** / 4.7****
|
10.3* / 10.3*** / 10.5****
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
tested by: *C&D, **R&T, ***MT, ****Wheels
|
|
|
|
|
|
GS200t
|
2015
|
Front-engined,
RWD,
4WS |
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel
|
4845 / 1840 / 1455 mm |
2850 mm |
Inline-4
|
1998 cc |
DOHC 16 valves, DVVT
|
Turbo |
DI |
245 hp
|
258 lbft
|
8-speed automatic
|
F: double-wishbone
R: multi-link
|
Adaptive damping
|
235/45R18
|
1745 kg
|
143 mph (c)
|
6.9 (c) / 6.6*
|
16.7*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
tested by: *C&D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright©
1997-2017
by Mark Wan @ AutoZine
|
|