|
|
Published
on 20
May 2014
|
All rights reserved.
|
|
Until now Volkswagen
does not have a proper weapon to fight against Ford C-Max, Citroen C4
Picasso and Renault Scenic in the compact MPV segment. The Golf Plus is
merely a Golf with a taller body, while the larger Touran is about as
interesting as a school bus. As the long-serving Golf Plus is due for
replacement, Wolfsburg has developed a better substitution, Golf
Sportsvan or simply Golf SV.
Built upon the flexible MQB platform of the latest Golf, the SV is able
to stretch wheelbase to 2685 mm, 50 mm longer than its hatchback
sibling. Moreover, it is 126 mm taller and marginally wider, so the
cabin is benefited with increased room. The MQB also contributes to
more lightness, as reflected by the 30 kg reduction of kerb weight.
More spacious yet lighter, who doesn’t want?
What the new SV doesn’t innovate much is styling. It keeps the
signature conservativeness of the VW brand, and can be easily
recognized as a variant of Golf. That’s not necessarily bad to buyers,
but I suppose a funkier looking MPV could be more desirable to young
families. In this respect, Citroen C4 Picasso has the edge.
What you can’t argue is the Volkswagen’s superior build quality,
especially inside. It carries over the high-quality materials and
tactile switchgears from the Golf. The dashboard design is similar but
not identical. The center console is no longer oriented to the driver.
The LCD screen is mounted at higher level for easier reading, whereas
air vents are relocated to either side. You sit 6 cm higher than the
case of the regular Golf, thus you can have a better view on the road.
The larger windows and additional rear quarter windows, which slim up
the C-pillars, afford better visibility, too.
As expected, the cabin has more storage cubbies. The front passenger
seat is foldable, and a drawer is provided beneath it. The 60/40-split
rear seats can slide back and forth independently for a range of 18 cm,
and it can recline or fold nearly flat. The boot floor is adjustable
for height. Its luggage volume, varying between 500 and 590 liters
depending on the position of rear bench, is competitive enough.
Nevertheless, this cabin still falls short of the flexibility of some
rivals. Its rear seat doesn’t tumble forward like Ford C-Max. Neither
does it serve the middle passenger as well as Citroen C4 Picasso as its
middle seat is narrow, flat and obstructed by the central tunnel.
Volkswagen’s interior design still lacks innovation.
However, in terms of driving dynamics the SV is good, as you would
expect for something building on MQB and riding on multi-link rear
suspensions, at least for models with more than 140 hp (note: torsion
beam axle serves lower power models). Its handling is sportier than
most rivals, if not as capable as C-Max. The ride could be a bit stiff
for a people carrier but in return it doesn’t roll or wallow like
French
cars. Moreover, you have a vast range of good Volkswagen engines to
choose from, especially the 150 hp 1.4 TSI with fuel-saving cylinder
cut-off technology and the torquey 2.0 TDI. Good DSG gearbox is another
bonus.
That said, high quality things come at a price, especially when they
are sealed with Volkswagen logos. The Golf SV is quite a lot more
expensive than the comparable Citroen and Ford, both of which are very
strong rivals. While it is certainly more competitive than Golf Plus,
it is not good enough to top the class yet.
|
Verdict: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Golf SV 1.4TSI DSG
|
2014
|
Front-engined,
FWD |
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel |
4338 / 1807 / 1578 mm |
2685 mm |
Inline-4
|
1395 cc |
DOHC 16 valves, DVVT
|
Turbo |
DI, cylinder deactivation
|
150 hp
|
184 lbft
|
7-speed twin-clutch
|
F: strut
R: multi-link
|
-
|
225/45R17 |
1334 kg
|
132 mph (c) |
8.3 (c)
|
- |
|
Golf SV 2.0TDI
|
2014
|
Front-engined,
FWD |
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel |
4338 / 1807 / 1578 mm |
2685 mm |
Inline-4, diesel
|
1968 cc |
DOHC 16 valves
|
VTG turbo |
CDI
|
150 hp
|
251 lbft
|
6-speed manual
|
F: strut
R: multi-link
|
- |
205/55R16 |
1399 kg
|
132 mph (c) |
8.7 (c)
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
tested by: -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright©
1997-2014
by Mark Wan @ AutoZine
|
|